Outcomes up to age 36 months after congenital Zika virus infection-U.S. states.

BACKGROUND: To characterize neurodevelopmental abnormalities in children up to 36 months of age with congenital Zika virus exposure. METHODS: From the U.S. Zika Pregnancy and Infant Registry, a national surveillance system to monitor pregnancies with laboratory evidence of Zika virus infection, pregnancy outcomes and presence of Zika associated birth defects (ZBD) were reported among infants with available information. Neurologic sequelae and developmental delay were reported among children with ≥1 follow-up exam after 14 days of age or with ≥1 visit with development reported, respectively. RESULTS: Among 2248 infants, 10.1% were born preterm, and 10.5% were small-for-gestational age. Overall, 122 (5.4%) had any ZBD; 91.8% of infants had brain abnormalities or microcephaly, 23.0% had eye abnormalities, and 14.8% had both. Of 1881 children ≥1 follow-up exam reported, neurologic sequelae were more common among children with ZBD (44.6%) vs. without ZBD (1.5%). Of children with ≥1 visit with development reported, 46.8% (51/109) of children with ZBD and 7.4% (129/1739) of children without ZBD had confirmed or possible developmental delay. CONCLUSION: Understanding the prevalence of developmental delays and healthcare needs of children with congenital Zika virus exposure can inform health systems and planning to ensure services are available for affected families. IMPACT: We characterize pregnancy and infant outcomes and describe neurodevelopmental abnormalities up to 36 months of age by presence of Zika associated birth defects (ZBD). Neurologic sequelae and developmental delays were common among children with ZBD. Children with ZBD had increased frequency of neurologic sequelae and developmental delay compared to children without ZBD. Longitudinal follow-up of infants with Zika virus exposure in utero is important to characterize neurodevelopmental delay not apparent in early infancy, but logistically challenging in surveillance models.

Zika-Associated Birth Defects Reported in Pregnancies with Laboratory Evidence of Confirmed or Possible Zika Virus Infection - U.S. Zika Pregnancy and Infant Registry, December 1, 2015-March 31, 2018.

Zika virus infection during pregnancy can cause serious birth defects of the brain and eyes, including intracranial calcifications, cerebral or cortical atrophy, chorioretinal abnormalities, and optic nerve abnormalities (1,2). The frequency of these Zika-associated brain and eye defects, based on data from the U.S. Zika Pregnancy and Infant Registry (USZPIR), has been previously reported in aggregate (3,4). This report describes the frequency of individual Zika-associated brain and eye defects among infants from pregnancies with laboratory evidence of confirmed or possible Zika virus infection. Among 6,799 live-born infants in USZPIR born during December 1, 2015-March 31, 2018, 4.6% had any Zika-associated birth defect; in a subgroup of pregnancies with a positive nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) for Zika virus infection, the percentage was 6.1% of live-born infants. The brain and eye defects most frequently reported included microcephaly, corpus callosum abnormalities, intracranial calcification, abnormal cortical gyral patterns, ventriculomegaly, cerebral or cortical atrophy, chorioretinal abnormalities, and optic nerve abnormalities. Among infants with any Zika-associated birth defect, one third had more than one defect reported. Certain brain and eye defects in an infant might prompt suspicion of prenatal Zika virus infection. These findings can help target surveillance efforts to the most common brain and eye defects associated with Zika virus infection during pregnancy should a Zika virus outbreak reemerge, and might provide a signal to the reemergence of Zika virus, particularly in geographic regions without ongoing comprehensive Zika virus surveillance.

Assessing the value of reviewing all fetal death records for birth defects surveillance, compared to only those with maternal anomaly codes.

BACKGROUND: The Arizona Birth Defects Monitoring Program (ABDMP) creates case-finding lists of potential birth defects. As part of this, ABDMP includes all fetal death records, in addition to records for mothers and infants with an associated birth defect code. This project aims to understand the value of including all fetal deaths in case-finding, and to assess the impact on the rate of birth defects if all fetal death cases are not reviewed. METHODS: We assessed 2016-2017 fetal death records based on case-finding source and ICD-10 CM codes. We categorized cases by whether they had a hospital discharge ICD-10 CM code indicating a maternal diagnosis for a fetal anomaly (i.e., "O35" code), and compared them to cases reported only by a stillbirth code, meaning that a baby was born deceased, with no reference to birth defects. Positive and negative predictive values were calculated (PPV, NPV, respectively). RESULTS: For 2016-2017, fetal deaths make up 6% (n = 89) of all confirmed birth defects (n = 1,416), and fetal deaths with no O35 code make up 4% (n = 54) of all confirmed birth defects cases in Arizona. Had cases without an O35 code not been included, 4% (n = 54) of confirmed birth defect cases in Arizona for 2016-2017 would have been missed. The PPV was 68.6%. CONCLUSION: The work involved in reviewing the additional 1,000 records per year is warranted by the value noted. It is evident that by including all fetal deaths we capture a more accurate picture of the occurrence of birth defects in Arizona.

Postfolate spina bifida lesion level change.

BACKGROUND: Spina bifida accounts for a large proportion of birth defects in the United States. Studies have evaluated the decrease in prevalence at birth after folate fortification of food grains, but little is known about neurologic functional changes related to fortification. This study assesses the functional level of lesions in the prefortification and postfortification eras. METHODS: Data were collected through retrospective review of medical records from a regional multispecialty clinic in Arizona. This study included individuals born between 1981-1995 (prefortification) and 1999-2013 (postfortification). Patients were included if they had a primary diagnosis of spina bifida with or without hydrocephalus. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in functional lesion level with an 85% reduction in thoracic level lesions in the postfortification era (p < .005). There were no differences in gender or ethnicity across eras; however, Hispanic ethnicity had a higher number of cases overall (51.7%). The most common lesion level in both eras was mid-lumbar, accounting for 35.7 and 34.4% of cases in the prefolate and postfolate eras, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a significant difference in the distribution of lesion level of spina bifida patients born in the postfortification era, based on neurologic function. Further research with a larger sample size is needed to determine if this observation holds true nationally.

Infants born with critical CHD in Arizona and capacities of birth centres for screening and management.

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to identify locations of births in Arizona with critical CHD, as well as to assess the current use of pulse-oximetry screening and capacities of birth centres to manage a positive screen. Study design Infants (n=487) with a potentially critical CHD were identified from the Arizona Department of Health Services from 2012 and 2013; charts were retrospectively reviewed. Diagnosis was confirmed using echocardiographies. ArcGIS was used to generate maps to visualise the location of treating facility and mother's residence. Birth centres were surveyed to assess screening practices and capacities to manage critical CHD in 2015. RESULTS: Of the 272 patients identified with critical CHD, 52% had been diagnosed prenatally. Patients travelled an average distance of 55.1 miles to their treating facility. Mortality was not related to prenatal diagnosis (p=0.30), living at a high elevation (p=0.82), or to distance travelled to the treating facility (p=0.68). Of 50 birth centres, 33 responded to the survey and all centres practiced critical CHD screening. A total of 25 centres could perform paediatric echocardiographies; 64% of these centres could digitally transmit echocardiograms. In all, 24 birth centres maintained access to prostaglandins. CONCLUSIONS: Pulse-oximetry screening in newborns is currently implemented in the majority of Arizona hospitals. Although most centres could perform initial management steps following a positive screen, access to paediatric cardiology services was limited. Patients with critical CHD sometimes travelled a great distance to treating facilities. Digital transmission of echocardiograms or tele-echocardiography would reduce the distance travelled for the management of a positive screen, decrease the financial burden of transportation, and expedite care for critically ill neonates.